Updates
- Originally published, May 11, 9:47 pm.
- May 12, 8:40 am:
- Jim Dennis (@AnswrGuy) responded to the below on Donald Trump. His point is largely correct but I explore it and I think the exploration is important.
- May 12, 9:05 am:
- Oh yeah, it’s Mother’s Day. (Really so not good at this sort of thing, sorry.)
A big MEOW and #HappyMothersDay to all the moms out there. #MothersDay2019 pic.twitter.com/OLqmT6srT1
— Cat Food Breath (@CatFoodBreath) May 12, 2019
- Oh yeah, it’s Mother’s Day. (Really so not good at this sort of thing, sorry.)
The less-awful news is that Lyft didn’t require a background check for moving to Pennsylvania. There were some pesky details, but as of yesterday, I’m driving for Lyft in the Pittsburgh area.
I’m noticing the earnings are not as high as in California, probably mostly because so few of the trips involve freeway miles. Other factors that might be involved are that I’m driving earlier and quitting earlier here than I did in California, it is a different area and I haven’t adjusted to the cultural patterns here yet, I’m presently driving for Lyft rather than Uber (Uber hasn’t completed my background check yet and even in California, I made more with Uber than I did with Lyft), and, of course, Lyft might (and I would expect probably does) pay a little less here than in Marin County, California, where I focused when I was there.
On the other hand, I’m driving fewer miles, at least so far. When I’m ready to go to work, I just go up to my car, go on line, and sit for a few minutes. An order, so far, has always arrived within a few minutes.
In the category of are you fucking kidding me?
But I stopped at home for lunch and a neighbor had a BB gun out with his kids. (Last I saw, the kids had gotten bored and wandered off.) It looks enough like a real gun that maybe—only maybe—the idiot will manage to get himself shot by the police. This is less likely since he and his kids are all white. In the meantime, I’m hoping he doesn’t manage to shoot one of my windows.No marksmanship here: At left is his target. But he’s so cool, lying prone, shooting a BB gun.
Donald Trump
Those inclined to view Donald Trump as the mastermind of some sort of diabolical threat would do well to read Anna Phillips’ article. The Trump administration is in such a hurry to roll back environmental (and other) regulation that it’s not following the required procedures for doing so. Which invites successful court challenges, notably from California.[1] Which just ain’t terribly bright.
Stupider, my guess is that the Trump administration is counting on being able to appeal these losses to the Supreme Court. My second guess is that the Supreme Court will, at some point, just stop accepting these cases, letting lower court rulings stand.
In a way, that’s bad news: Supreme Court rulings slapping the Trump administration down will have greater impact. But this is really basic shit. We’re talking Regulation 101 level stuff.
Update:
Trump doesn’t actually care if his actions (regulatory rollbacks, etc) are effective in any way, nor if the fail every test in court.
Such things are irrelevant.
It’s all about hw they feed his base and his ego. Every loss in court just fuels more of his victimhood narrative.
— Jim Dennis (@answrguy) May 12, 2019
Slept on this for a few hours. This is true in many ways on many topics. But one should certainly not overlook that many conservatives (multiple tendencies) share an extreme antipathy toward regulation. 1/14 https://t.co/9XHeNa5SVR
— David Benfell, Ph.D. (@n4rky) May 12, 2019
Having had some brushes with regulation myself lately, I can say I even understand that antipathy. The trouble is that hating something doesn’t make it dispensable, even if conservatives, especially @realDonaldTrump and his appointees, treat it as such. 2/14
— David Benfell, Ph.D. (@n4rky) May 12, 2019
Yes, I agree that @realDonaldTrump‘s first priority is his base. This emerges from the racist, clearly #AuthoritarianPopulist, bordering on #Paleoconservative, zealotry against so-called #PoliticalCorrectness. 3/14
— David Benfell, Ph.D. (@n4rky) May 12, 2019
It also emerges from @realDonaldTrump‘s judicial appointments that 1) provoke the “libtards,” and 2) skew the courts in a #SocialConservative direction. This is him talking, and for the latter, *delivering* to his base, absolutely. 4/14
— David Benfell, Ph.D. (@n4rky) May 12, 2019
But there’s one thing I said early on in this nightmare: Watch what @realDonaldTrump does rather than what he says. As alienating and infuriating as the latter is, there is a theme in the former. 5/14
— David Benfell, Ph.D. (@n4rky) May 12, 2019
And that theme is deregulation, a #Neoliberal (and therefore #Neoconservative, because for neoconservatives, #Neoliberalism is a moral imperative) and #CapitalistLibertarian priority that brings around even some of @realDonaldTrump‘s #NeverTrump opponents. 6/14
— David Benfell, Ph.D. (@n4rky) May 12, 2019
This is an important point because when we look at the tendencies of #Conservatism from my dissertation, we just in the above have five out of those seven tendencies. 7/14
— David Benfell, Ph.D. (@n4rky) May 12, 2019
Now look at #FunctionalistConservatives: Their priority is self-preservation in their positions and privileges over the rest of us. And we now see how @realDonaldTrump has captured the @GOP, because this is how they resist being “primaried.” There’s only one tendency left: 8/14
— David Benfell, Ph.D. (@n4rky) May 12, 2019
#TraditionalistConservatism, which shares nearly all #SocialConservative priorities, including the misogynistic ones, and says something like (this is based off an actual quote) “two cheers for capitalism, not three,” and is therefore broadly sympathetic 9/14
— David Benfell, Ph.D. (@n4rky) May 12, 2019
with deregulation. Not only that, historically (they’ve reformed to some, unknown, degree) #Paleoconservatives probably didn’t really exist as an distinguishable tendency. A “reverse engineering” analysis suggests that they’d have been right there 10/14
— David Benfell, Ph.D. (@n4rky) May 12, 2019
(Re-reading this after the Twitter post, I should have put scare quotes around ‘reformed’ in the above. As I was composing this, I was actually thinking of Traditionalist Conservatives, who in ‘reforming’ (still in scare quotes), have moved towards leaving racism, but not misogyny, behind.)
with #AuthoritarianPopulists (whom I failed to distinguish #Paleoconservatives from on #UnauthorizedMigration) and, yes, #TraditionalistConservatives, who included Richard Weaver, a professor who screamed “culture” and meant race. 11/14
— David Benfell, Ph.D. (@n4rky) May 12, 2019
For @realDonaldTrump, this is a complete sweep of my tendencies of conservatism. They won’t go down with him: One lesson of #Watergate should be that ideas do not die even when individual politicians are disgraced (#Neoconservatism‘s roots lie in this era). 12/14
— David Benfell, Ph.D. (@n4rky) May 12, 2019
But nearly all conservatives will be broadly sympathetic with the program an idiot savant @realDonaldTrump has assembled. He’s still an idiot. But they’re sticking with him down to the final count. Beating him will be hard. 13/14
— David Benfell, Ph.D. (@n4rky) May 12, 2019
This is key to a response. One one side, you have a nearly unanimous conservatism in support of the vile @realDonaldTrump. Come an election, you have something to clearly distinguish yourself from. And #Neoliberalism, as in the mainstream of @TheDemocrats, won’t do it. 14/14
— David Benfell, Ph.D. (@n4rky) May 12, 2019
Anna M. Phillips, “In Trump vs. California, the state is winning nearly all its environmental cases,” Los Angeles Times, May 7, 2019, https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-california-trump-environmental-lawsuits-20190507-story.html
Uber
The Uber initial public offering (IPO) is a flop. I suggest reading the article by Faiz Siddiqui and Greg Bensinger anyway. We’re seeing the differences between venture capital, as enamored with anything high tech, and Wall Street, as somewhat less enamored with indefinite losses.[2] But also read the article by Dan Primack: There were other factors involved as well.[3]
Faiz Siddiqui and Greg Bensinger, “Uber’s first day of trading ended deep in the red over gig-economy fears,” Washington Post, May 10, 2019, https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/05/10/uber-ipo/
Dan Primack, “Uber’s IPO got caught in a perfect storm,” Axios, May 11, 2019, https://www.axios.com/ubers-ipo-perfect-storm-2a75a55a-adec-496b-bc23-02d99d02920f.html
- [1]Anna M. Phillips, “In Trump vs. California, the state is winning nearly all its environmental cases,” Los Angeles Times, May 7, 2019, https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-california-trump-environmental-lawsuits-20190507-story.html↩
- [2]Faiz Siddiqui and Greg Bensinger, “Uber’s first day of trading ended deep in the red over gig-economy fears,” Washington Post, May 10, 2019, https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/05/10/uber-ipo/↩
- [3]Dan Primack, “Uber’s IPO got caught in a perfect storm,” Axios, May 11, 2019, https://www.axios.com/ubers-ipo-perfect-storm-2a75a55a-adec-496b-bc23-02d99d02920f.html↩